Texas motor vehicle claims — general information, not legal advice
[General Phone Number][General Inquiries Email]
TX Case ReviewTexas accident claims

Home › Guides › Fault & Evidence

Texas Accident Resource

Fault and Evidence in Texas: Why One Percentage Point Ends a Claim

How Texas apportions responsibility between drivers, what the 50 percent ceiling actually does to a recovery, and which evidence decides where the percentage lands.

  • Written by the National Claim Network content team
  • Legal review: not performed — general information only
  • Last reviewed: 21 August 2026
  • Jurisdiction: Texas

The short answer

Texas bars recovery entirely if your share of responsibility is greater than 50 percent. At 50 percent or below you recover, reduced by your percentage. That cliff edge is why fault evidence matters more here than in states with a pure comparative rule.

The 51% bar

What the statute actually says

A claimant may not recover damages if his percentage of responsibility is greater than 50 percent. If you are not barred, the court reduces damages by a percentage equal to your responsibility, then subtracts the dollar value of any settlements already taken.

Your share of fault Recovery on $100,000 Effect
0% $100,000 Full recovery
25% $75,000 Reduced by your share
50% $50,000 Still recovers — the bar has not been crossed
51% Nothing Barred entirely

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 33.001, § 33.012(a), (b).

How fault is argued

Six arguments used to push your share over half

Because the difference between 50 and 51 percent is the difference between a payment and nothing, an insurer has a strong incentive to move the number. None of these arguments are unusual.

01

Speed

Not necessarily above the limit — travelling too fast for the conditions is enough to support an allocation.

02

Failure to keep a proper lookout

A general assertion that you should have seen and reacted sooner. Hard to disprove without video or an independent witness.

03

Following distance

Standard in every rear-end claim, and the reason brake-light function is worth photographing.

04

Delayed reaction

Phone records, in-car systems and passenger accounts are all used here.

05

Prior condition

Not a fault argument so much as a causation one, but it lands in the same place: less of the harm is attributed to this crash.

06

Your own words

A statement at the scene or in a recorded interview, quoted back. “I didn’t see them” does a lot of work for an adjuster.

The evidence

What actually decides the percentage

Roughly in order of how persuasive it is, and inversely in order of how long it survives.

The CR-3 crash report

The officer’s diagram, narrative and contributing-factor codes. Filed within ten days. Influential, but an officer’s assessment is not a legal finding and binds nobody.

Scene photographs

Vehicle rest positions before anything is moved are the single most useful thing a non-expert can capture.

Independent witnesses

The most persuasive category and the fastest to become unreachable. Numbers taken at the scene, or nothing.

Video

Dashcam, doorbell and business CCTV. Nearby CCTV is routinely overwritten within days, so a written preservation request has to go out immediately.

Vehicle data

Event data recorders can hold pre-crash speed, throttle and braking — but only while the vehicle exists in its post-crash state.

Medical records

They establish causation and severity. Treatment gaps are used to attack both.

How fast it disappears

The two-year deadline is generous. The evidence is not.

Evidence Typical survival
Business CCTV Days — often overwritten within a week
Vehicle rest positions Minutes
Witness availability Weeks, then declining sharply
Event data recorder Until the vehicle is repaired or salvaged
Dashcam footage Until the loop overwrites it
CR-3 report About ten years plus the current year, at TxDOT

Tex. Transp. Code § 550.062(b), § 550.065(d); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003.

Common questions

Questions people ask

What is modified comparative negligence?

It is a rule that reduces your damages by your share of responsibility and bars recovery entirely above a threshold. Texas sets that threshold at more than 50 percent, so a claimant exactly 50 percent at fault still recovers half.

Who decides the fault percentage?

Ultimately a jury, if the case is tried. In practice adjusters and lawyers negotiate against their prediction of what a jury would do, which is why the evidence assembled early shapes the settlement.

Does the police report decide fault?

No. A contributing-factor code on a CR-3 is the investigating officer’s assessment, not a legal determination, and it is not binding. It is influential evidence, and it is often the starting point for the argument.

Can I still claim if I was partly at fault?

Yes, provided your share is not greater than 50 percent. Your damages are reduced by your percentage. Above 50 percent, Texas bars recovery entirely.

What should I do to protect the evidence?

Photograph before anything moves, take witness numbers at the scene, request nearby video in writing within days, and do not have the vehicle repaired or salvaged before anyone has looked at it.

Sources

What this page is built on

Every Texas rule stated here is taken from the primary source named below. The Texas statutes are published free by the Texas Legislative Council.

Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 33.001, 33.012Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003Tex. Transp. Code §§ 550.062, 550.065TxDOT crash reports and records

Keep reading

Where to go next

After a Crash

The first hour, the first week, and what Texas law requires at the scene.

Open the guide

Texas Rules

Deadlines, the fault ceiling, coverage minimums and reporting duties.

Open the guide

Accident Types

How the kind of crash changes fault, evidence and value.

Open the guide

Insurance & Claims

Which policy responds, and the deadlines your own insurer must meet.

Open the guide

Injuries

Common crash injuries and how the medical record becomes evidence.

Open the guide

Settlements

What a claim is built from, and what reduces it.

Open the guide

Editorial information

Who wrote and checked this page

  • Written by: National Claim Network content team
  • Legal review: not performed — general information only
  • Medical review: not performed — general information only
  • Last reviewed: 21 August 2026
  • Next scheduled review: 21 February 2027
  • Jurisdiction: Texas

Spotted something wrong or out of date? We correct errors and log the change. See our correction policy and about page.

Next steps

Worried about how fault will be split?

Read the Texas rules that apply, or see how a request for attorney review works. General information only, not legal advice.